Yesterday we talked through the ‘illuminating the border’ installation as part of a group critique.
The first interesting note was how people moved through the space. As we were a group of 10 or more, this put the installation under pressure. Could people experience anything with so many interruptions. It was great to see that people moved with relative ease and it created a thoughtful atmosphere.
The effect of shadow and reflection as backdrop and point of interest in its own right was interesting, The installation was added to by the interruption – this may be a really important point for development. If I want the installation to be truly interactive, then it must ‘work’ better if people are in it.
There were those who were reluctant to enter. Noise was an issue – sound levels have to be right. I thought of the idea of a warm whisper with louder interventions as a way of thinking about how the sound can attract people.
One colleague remarked the mirrors, he thought they worked much better with the installation, particularly in the interaction with the projection – where the stretched and distorted image broke across the mirror, which then reflected another part of the installation, really caught the eye. This, of course, was always changing, leading to viewers moving their heads to see themselves in the film landscapes, and seeing those landscapes change.
The smaller square mirrors, placed on the fabric and in direct line of the projection also changed the projection. The square mirror helped, because it fitted the square nature of the projection, like a collaged image within the projection – this effect was emphasised when the projection against the muslin and gauze caused the images to repeat and overlap making a displaced image collage.